Ariana Grande remains the most popular artiste on Spotify in Singapore. If the government has set such a low bar for “offensive speech” then tens of thousands of Singaporeans, especially among the youth are guilty by association.
The petition charged Nas Daily for making videos that perpetuated stereotypes and pushing a brainwashing agenda using subliminal messaging, making him a danger to Singapore. However, no explanation was given as to what these clips supposedly were.
In a Facebook post, Mr. Zhong described his surprise that his “harmless” comments would warrant such a heavy handed response.
Ms Yassin has also been outspoken in his praise for Singapore and the PAP government. Last year, Mr Yassin produced several videos on Singapore during his stopover while applying for a visa to Indonesia.
When Shanmugam says that the ban is required because ‘social harmony’ must be protected – is he really saying that if the government doesn’t ban such events, then religious conservatives have a free pass to throw tantrums, speak offensively, start riots, or find other ways to disrupt social harmony?
Overwhelmed by Ms Chan’s skilful rhetoric and ability in mobilising public sentiment, the Malaysian Government decided to forego all its claims to the 1962 Water Agreement.
I am doing my part as a Singaporean. I saw how the government responded to the Watain petition and saw it fit to take a stand against Maroon 5’s unwholesome influence.
The government has always championed quality in its highest echelons and maintained that only the best make its ranks. Are we seeing that today?
Wong was charged in Mar 2018 for receiving about S$107,000 in various forms of gratification from company director Chia Sin Lan between December 2014 and September 2016.